In a world grappling with extreme heat and a series of crises fueled by an addiction to oil and gas, the pursuit of collaborative energy transition may appear unrealistic or even radical. Nevertheless, today, more than 50 nations are convening in Santa Marta, Colombia, to begin outlining concrete strategies for eliminating fossil fuels, moving beyond the conditional global agreement on transitioning from fossil fuels in energy systems that was established at COP28 in Dubai. The slow progress towards this objective prompted Colombia and the Netherlands to form a coalition of nations eager to advance more swiftly and comprehensively. The participating countries include a mix of significant fossil fuel producers such as Australia, Norway, Brazil, Nigeria, and Mexico, alongside climate-vulnerable island nations like Fiji, Tuvalu, and the Maldives, as well as Denmark, Spain, France, and the European Union. Notably, the United States, Russia, China, and key Gulf petro-states like Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates are conspicuously absent. Reflecting on the conference, Mary Robinson, former President of Ireland and member of The Elders—a group of former world leaders advocating for peace, justice, and climate issues—characterized it as “a new multilateral space for a committee of doers … those who aspire to collaborate and phase out fossil fuels.” In a recent webinar preceding the conference, Robinson placed the event in the context of ongoing global tensions. “This
is a critical moment,” she remarked, highlighting the illegal warfare waged by the United States and Israel against Iran and its widespread implications. She argued that the deterioration of international law and the economic repercussions of the Iran conflict underscore the urgency of a just transition to renewable energy as a “security imperative.” The second major energy crisis in just four years serves not only as a wake-up call but also as “a clear indication that our energy systems require immediate structural reform.” Rather than attempting to drag every hesitant petro-state along simultaneously, Colombia and the Netherlands aim to create a modular coalition of countries to devise practical timelines and mechanisms that safeguard individuals, communities, and ecosystems while electrifying transportation and industry and enhancing conservation and efficiency to replace fossil fuels. Robinson pointed out that Spain, blessed with abundant solar and wind energy, has managed to keep electricity costs lower than countries still reliant on fossil fuels, adding that Pakistan’s people-led solar initiative has already helped the nation avoid over $12 billion in fossil fuel imports. The conference was organized with the belief that this more agile group of states can pioneer actionable ideas now and later integrate them into the slower-paced climate policy discussions held by the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. Unlike the largest UN climate summits that attract over 50,000 participants and often engage in lengthy negotiations over minute details, the Santa Marta conference is structured to be more inclusive, featuring open sessions and livestreaming. Instead of treating civil society as an afterthought, the event will incorporate a People’s Summit, uniting community groups, unions, Indigenous leaders, and public-interest advocates within the formal proceedings. The organizers are hopeful that a successful gathering could rejuvenate climate activism in the participating countries, fostering momentum to abandon fossil fuels as promptly as possible. Holding the conference during tumultuous times, when “some bullies are even attempting to coerce nations into remaining reliant on fossil fuels,” is a notable achievement, Robinson stated, demonstrating that a significant portion of the globe is eager to expedite the transition despite political obstacles. She referenced last year’s advisory opinion on climate change from the International Court of Justice in The Hague, which clarified that “liberating ourselves from fossil fuels is no longer merely a political duty,” urging states to take necessary actions for climate protection. Santa Marta should be regarded as the inception of a new process rather than a venue for expecting a grand declaration, asserted Natalie Jones, a senior policy advisor at the International Institute of Sustainable Development, a nonprofit organization monitoring international environmental negotiations. Jones emphasized that this is an ongoing process, not a make-or-break event, and given that the conference aligns with the Brazilian COP30 presidency efforts, she believes the outcomes from Santa Marta will influence a series of upcoming climate meetings, potentially generating further momentum for the transition at COP31 in Antalya, Turkey, scheduled for November. Any move to hasten the shift away from fossil fuels is beneficial, not only for climate reasons but also for energy security and affordable energy for households and businesses, she noted. The current global energy landscape is marked by uncertainty and chaos, with price volatility and shortages disproportionately affecting the most vulnerable populations. According to Jones, a “stable and credible policy environment” is essential to establish conditions conducive to a quicker phaseout of fossil fuels. She added that the roadmaps envisioned at the conference will provide governments with a clearer direction for investors, workers, and communities.
📝 Sobre este conteúdo
Esta matéria foi adaptada e reescrita pela equipe editorial do TudoAquiUSA
com base em reportagem publicada em
Insideclimatenews
. O texto foi modificado para melhor atender nosso público, mantendo a precisão
factual.
Veja o artigo original aqui.
0 Comentários
Entre para comentar
Use sua conta Google para participar da discussão.
Política de Privacidade
Carregando comentários...
Escolha seus interesses
Receba notificações personalizadas