The 'blue economy,' a concept promoting ocean-related projects, is under scrutiny. While it's a popular topic at international forums like the UN Ocean Conference, small-scale fishers are raising concerns. They argue that the blue economy, which includes offshore energy, coastal infrastructure, and fishing, often harms their livelihoods and the environment. The World Bank defines the blue economy as sustainable resource use for economic growth, while preserving ocean ecosystems. However, development projects under this banner can negatively affect coastal communities. For example, a new fishing port in Kenya, part of the blue economy plan, may have reduced catches for local fishers and damaged coral. Small-scale fishers are protesting against what they see as exploitation, associating the blue economy with activities that harm them, such as mass tourism and unsustainable fishing. They are advocating for 'blue justice,' which prioritizes the rights and well-being of coastal communities. Critics say the term is used to justify business interests at the expense of local communities. The concept has led to funding from various sources, but concerns remain about the exclusion of small-scale fishers from decision-making. The Coalition for Fair Fisheries Arrangements (CFFA) and other groups are working to protect the interests of fishers, demanding that their participation guide new ocean use. They are pushing for marine tenure rights and preferential access areas. The term 'blue justice'
Blue Economy Backlash: Small-Scale Fishers Fight for 'Blue Justice' Against Ocean Exploitation
Small-scale fishers are challenging the 'blue economy,' arguing it harms ecosystems and communities, advocating for 'blue justice' instead.
5
visualizações
0
curtidas
0
comentários
0 Comentários
Entre para comentar
Use sua conta Google para participar da discussão.
Política de Privacidade
Carregando comentários...
Escolha seus interesses
Receba notificações personalizadas